> You're literally saying the press is acting against their own best interest and purpose which is upside down. Are you suggesting that them acting a certain w

> You're literally saying the press is acting against their own best interest and purpose which is upside down. Are you suggesting that them acting a certain way shows that acting that way is in their best interest (because they wouldn't act that way otherwise)? Are you sure they know what cause of action is in their best interest? Are you sure they consider "their best interest" to be the same you consider it to be? Is the 24/7 news cycle hype in the best interest of "the media"? Was the war-drumming with barely any skepticism about the Iraq war(s) in their best interest? > Second - we don't need the press to find wrongdoing. It's all there for you to see. Where is the scandal? What? The public at large gets their information from the press. If the press does not report, it does not happen for large parts of the public. That's why taking control of the press is usually the first thing during any coup and for any authoritarian state.