4 ms·
This has nothing to do with so-called SJWs. Please think twice before using politically toxic language in a thread that isn't even about politics. I guess it pl
by foldr 6y ago
This has nothing to do with so-called SJWs. Please think twice before using politically toxic language in a thread that isn't even about politics. I guess it pleases you to tell a story about how this trivial UI design decision is actually the result of the machinations of your political enemies. But there is absolutely zero evidence for that. Do you really find it so hard to imagine that the decision was made with good intentions?
- TheSpiceIsLife 6y agoI said this early today, but let me rephrase it in a harder manner. Do you really find it so hard to imagine that the Nazis really wanted to exterminate the Jews? I’m just saying: there are evil people out there with evil intentions. Fair chance some of them are lining their pockets working at Big Corp USA.
- pjc50 6y agoFour comments from "hiding a URL is bad" to "Nazis". Well done everyone. You've made me take the time to flag every single comment that uses SJW as a pejorative, and the thread as a whole for off-topic flamebait.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- zzzcpan 6y agoGood intentions never had a role in decision making in hierarchical organizations, there is no known history of that. Plenty of the opposite, with subordinates only caring what their bosses think, giving up on moral principles they had, etc. Imagining good intentions is just bullshit, basically a way to avoid dissent, to trick or force obedience. Which seems to be exactly what are you trying to do here. Even if the post is wrong in details and uses terminology not the way you'd like, it's still way more right than this "good intentions" idea.