27 ms·
There's a catch though. We primarily use GCP - About a month and a half ago we were planning to run a large compute job, since GCP already had these great perfo
by rajnathani 6y ago
There's a catch though. We primarily use GCP - About a month and a half ago we were planning to run a large compute job, since GCP already had these great performance-to-cost AMD EPYC 2nd gen Rome VMs available then, we decided to use them, only to find out later that there was a service quota of 24 vCPUs for these instances. The worse part of it was that it wasn't even clear in the service quota page that there was no point in requesting anything beyond 24, as for whatever number we put 512, 256, 128, 32, etc. for all cases we would get automatically rejected. Essentially it was a hard quota limit, and in principle it felt like it went against the launch blog post [0] of GCP stating a case of 224 vCPUs of these new EPYC processors being used at a time.
I'm not sure what the service quota is like on AWS, however it could be that AWS waited to procure enough of these new EPYC processors to be able to provide a reasonable amount of such compute for their large customer base.
[0] https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/compute/announcing-the-n2d-vm-family-based-on-amd https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/compute/announcing-th...