I have to say I'm consistently impressed by NanoVG. Not because it does anything fancy, but because it doesn't. It's not the fastest or the most featureful vect

I have to say I'm consistently impressed by NanoVG. Not because it does anything fancy, but because it doesn't. It's not the fastest or the most featureful vector renderer out there, but it resides in a very nice sweet spot that balances performance, features, and simplicity. In general I've found NanoVG to have comparable performance to the master branch of Pathfinder. NanoVG currently performs better at text (PF's implementation is designed to get international text right first and optimization hasn't really been done yet), while PF generally does better at complex vector workloads like the tiger.