5 ms·
More realistically. Mathematica is the best at some things, but is hopelessly behind in others (e.g. algebraic number theory and group theory). Computational ma
by williamstein 6y ago
More realistically. Mathematica is the best at some things, but is hopelessly behind in others (e.g. algebraic number theory and group theory). Computational mathematics is deep and vast.
- BeetleB 6y agoWell, I can't argue with the Father of Sage :-) A bit surprised to hear that, though. Do you mean Sage is better in algebraic number theory as a whole, or is it more of some aspects are better with Sage and others with Mathematica? Any one done a writeup comparing the strengths of Sage w.r.t Mathematica/Maple/etc? (In detail, not just big picture).