3 ms·
I 'turned on him' because as I learned more about him I trusted his motives less. If I thought his motives were pure, I would give him more slack but I think h
by iaw 6y ago
I 'turned on him' because as I learned more about him I trusted his motives less.
If I thought his motives were pure, I would give him more slack but I think he has nefarious motives based on his indiscriminate releases. 150 years sounds right for a spy at his stature without a state sponsor, good thing we aren't at war or there may be an argument to kill him.
- dependenttypes 6y agoIf anything his "indiscriminate releases" shows that his motive was pure, compared with releasing only what you like.