Found it (Google didn't help at all) on page 19 of the oral history of David Ditzel at the computer history museum. https://archive.computerhistory.org/resourc

Found it (Google didn't help at all) on page 19 of the oral history of David Ditzel at the computer history museum. https://archive.computerhistory.org/resources/access/text/2016/07/102737949-05-01-acc.pdf https://archive.computerhistory.org/resources/access/text/20... But I sort of remembered it wrong. Here he talks about having to switch from IBM but in page 16 he talks about the new lab not being able to make chips for a whole year as being the problem. "In the end, Transmeta didn't make it, and I'll just say here I think it was not because of the technologies. It actually turned out to be manufacturing problems. We switched fabs. The fab we switched to actually had a problem, and couldn't actually make our chips for a year. We had to prove where the issue was in the fab, and what was happening. They're not happy if I speak too much about those details. But, the technology itself worked fine."