Good question/intuition. You are correct in that I am appealing (exploiting?) the Liar's paradox [1]. The gist of which is that the truth-value of the proposit

Good question/intuition. You are correct in that I am appealing (exploiting?) the Liar's paradox [1]. The gist of which is that the truth-value of the proposition is undecidable. You could interpret my statement as a performative contradiction; or you could interpret it as a lie, but a far more interesting a conversation would ensue if you simply ask me "Why do you say that?" Which is why I said that it's up to you on how you choose to handle the exception (which I have intentionally triggered in your brain). The way I would prefer you to interpret my intentional contradiction is to see it for what it is. I am engaging in cooperative multi-tasking [2]. I am yielding control by triggering an exception. Your turn to steer the conversation. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liar_paradox https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liar_paradox [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooperative_multitasking https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooperative_multitasking