4 ms·
> good at being human-readable If we consider high composability, non-ambiguity, clarity, expressability (even a word?) as aspects of "human readability" - YAM
by raghava 6y ago
> good at being human-readable
If we consider high composability, non-ambiguity, clarity, expressability (even a word?) as aspects of "human readability" - YAML doesn't go very far in the scale across many of these. A language, with slightly more appealing (yet non-limiting for programmablity) declarative constructs seem very helpful for needs like this.
It would be great to see any spider-web-graph of all these solutions across those aspects and thus help someone to take a wiser decision.