4 ms·
> The problem would of course be that you would have to keep around a different browser to render old sites. Not really, you could polyfill the missing feature
by lazyjones 6y ago
> The problem would of course be that you would have to keep around a different browser to render old sites.
Not really, you could polyfill the missing features like it's commonly done with many unimplemented new ones.
I'd prefer starting from scratch, with a completely new, simple language that can be translated quickly to HTML/CSS/JS. You'd have to remove those interested in being gatekeepers of the web and sabotaging any efforts to make browsers simpler from the W3C though.
- c-smile 6y ago> simple language What is conceptually wrong (or complex) with current HTML/CSS ? What would you change?