2 ms·
It's not just that they were conquered, but then they were defined as uniquely evil for all time, but then the struggle to maintain that and include or exclude
by perl4ever 6y ago
It's not just that they were conquered, but then they were defined as uniquely evil for all time, but then the struggle to maintain that and include or exclude others as similar never ends. Godwin's law wouldn't be a thing if anyone controlled language even in this specific area. People wouldn't to this day casually compare people and groups to Nazis if there was such a thing as controlling people through language.
Given your statement that "enhanced interrogation" is still going on, that means from my framing that calling it torture failed to stop it, hence attempts to control it through language failed. You're saying that language allows it to happen, but I would say the correct framing is that doing it and the desire of people to rationalize it allows it to happen. The euphemism being an effect rather than a cause.
- watwut 6y agoThat sounds illogical to me. You define "controlling through something" in a way that makes it impossible. Yes, nazi lost wwii, no it does not prove their control of langue failed. No, there being two opposing sides trying to control langue and one of them not winning does not prove control through langue does not work. Frankly, there are very illogical argument.