> was disappointed to see that Redis still uses the “master” and “slave” terminology in order to identify different roles in Redis replication. What's funny to

> was disappointed to see that Redis still uses the “master” and “slave” terminology in order to identify different roles in Redis replication. What's funny to me, it's these people are against the terminology but not against the concept. Like if you are against the words, why is okay for a Redis node to be a slave and ordered around by a Redis master? Shouldn't all Redis nodes be equal?