I'd believe it if there weren't so many inaccurate reports claiming exactly that. His wording: >"..ad-libbed speculations about Floyd’s “great day” looking dow

I'd believe it if there weren't so many inaccurate reports claiming exactly that. His wording: >"..ad-libbed speculations about Floyd’s “great day” looking down from heaven at Trump’s crisis management and new unemployment numbers.." very much sounds like he thinks the same, and a majority of the readership familiar with the story are going to read it that way even if you can be extremely charitable and say that this isn't what he meant. I know he is familiar with the reporting on this, so if he didn't mean it I doubt he'd be so ambigous in that statement.