3 ms·
It’s pretty clear that there are some grunts/vocalizations that are shared amongst all humans (and possibly primates) these would yes/agreement, no/disagreement
by dogma1138 6y ago
It’s pretty clear that there are some grunts/vocalizations that are shared amongst all humans (and possibly primates) these would yes/agreement, no/disagreement, and question mark/surprise those aren’t language dependent.
I’m not sure if it’s actually convergent evolution like the research paper implies my bet would that these predate humans by quite a bit, and some languages have a stronger onomatopoeic relationship between the base grunts and their question word.
Even in English ‘What’ has the basic huh in it, wha/ha it wouldn’t surprise me if the T was added to make it more distinct or allow for more tonal information be passed along such as surprise, displeasure, disappointment and even anger.
My non-linguistically educated opinion is that huh and and other grunts like a-ha (not the band) are probably much older than humans and they are universal just as female copulatory sounds are in humans and other primates (there is more to girls moaning in bed than just pleasure).
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_copulatory_vocalizations https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_copulatory_vocalizati...
- TomMarius 6y agoWhat is "co" [tso] in my language and people here are making the same arguments with it
- dogma1138 6y agoWell depending on the tonal formalization of it at least how I would pronounce it would probably be very similar to huh just a non-guttural version of it that may have evolved because the language itself is non-guttural. The question really is if a non-English or any second language speaker of your language understand “huh” as in not the word but the grunt, my bet would be yes.
- jeltz 6y agoWhat about language specific grunts like the Northern Swedish way of saying yes by sucking in air? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=URgdIAz4QNg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=URgdIAz4QNg