3 ms·

The paragraphs are numbered for you. The legal field often prefers to reference numbered paragraphs instead of page numbers. It can be easier. Paragraph 29 is

The paragraphs are numbered for you. The legal field often prefers to reference numbered paragraphs instead of page numbers. It can be easier. Paragraph 29 is on page 8. You claimed the authors of the roadmap paper are "wrong". You cited a couple of purported Google competitors, Facebook and Verizon. I noted that in their response to CMA report Google did not mention those two competitors. They mentioned several other ones, none of them as prominent as Facebook or Verizon. Then you said there are "many other" competitors, too, besides Facebook and Verizon. I am wondering why Google did mention any of these competitors you are referring to in their response to the CMA report. Seems like it would be relevant to mention them.

nl 6y ago
Page 8 has footnote 29. Paragraphs aren't numbered. It doesn't name competitors there so I'm pretty confused. However page 7 does say: The Market Study will need to take account of the ways in which other players are entering, expanding, or consolidating in the supply of digital ads Examples include Amazon’s growing ads business, Verizon (which purchased AOL and Yahoo!), the integrated AT&T/Time Warner/AppNexus businesses, AdForm, and Alibaba – one of China’s largest digital ad providers that recently... The reference in that quote include footnote 29. Perhaps you are confusing footnotes/references with the substantive response?