8 ms·
Yes, it is an argument. It is not evidence, it may not be compelling argument for you, but it’s unquestionably an argument. I refuse to accept that courts deem
by sjwright 6y ago
Yes, it is an argument. It is not evidence, it may not be compelling argument for you, but it’s unquestionably an argument.
I refuse to accept that courts deemed compiled code to not be a creative work or intellectual property. Remember—a lot of early computer code was written in assembler...
- labawi 6y agoSo you refuse to accept the fact, for which there is evidence[1], that in given time and place, courts ruled object code not to be copyrightable, and furthermore it was not a solitary ruling and it was consistent with the rules of law at the time, so you call the ruling spectacularly ridiculous. You may call it an argument. I may then argue by refusing to accept it. [1] please view pdf linked above