4 ms·
I’m a big proponent of schema-rich SQL but I don’t see the argument here. Enforced schemas can be a bottleneck for change no matter where it’s enforced. And ju
by sjwright 6y ago
I’m a big proponent of schema-rich SQL but I don’t see the argument here. Enforced schemas can be a bottleneck for change no matter where it’s enforced.
And just because some parts of a schema need to be “in line” doesn’t mean all of it must be. Maybe I care that “Customer ID” is enforced, but not “Australian Tax File Number” or “Document revision annotations”.