4 ms·
I agree, though Haskell is certainly the most advanced. ML languages tend to be... primitive, at least to the modern eye. The lack of function polymorphism in O
by smabie 6y ago
I agree, though Haskell is certainly the most advanced. ML languages tend to be... primitive, at least to the modern eye. The lack of function polymorphism in OCaml is such a huge bummer. Modular implicits have been proposed (in a paper from 2014), but it doesn't seem that they are being actively worked on. If I could get multicore and modular implicits, OCaml would be the ideal language.
- octachron 6y agoModular implicits are being worked on actively, it is just a hard feature to get right in a scalable and future-compatible way.