3 ms·
If thats the case, then they really should have pointed that out
by person_of_color 6y ago
If thats the case, then they really should have pointed that out
- emilfihlman 6y agoNah, you can solve that by just using more expensive tech (ie higher adc bit depth and faster sampling). The cool thing is that it's doable!
- mdturnerphys 6y agoIt depends on what the noise sources are. If you're ADC limited, sure, but if you're limited by something else--detector noise, air turbulence affecting the signal, variation in LED output, noise in the room--a better LED won't help.
- emilfihlman 6y agoExcept it will a long way down. The random noise would have to match the characteristics of human speech for there to not be information that's possible to gather in an uncoded system.
- mdturnerphys 6y agoThat's an interesting claim. It's true in theory--the information is still there--but what's actually going to do the separation of the noise from the signal?
- emilfihlman 6y agoOne would have to characterise the system and apply pretty rad filtering. Actually hmm, I don't know if machine learning or neural networks or genetic programming have been tried on this, but it sure does sound like something they could work at!
- mdturnerphys 6y agoWhoops, should be "a better ADC won't help."