4 ms·
After the latest Jepsen analysis of Mongo I'm surprised anyone would use it for anything that serious.
by pier25 6y ago
After the latest Jepsen analysis of Mongo I'm surprised anyone would use it for anything that serious.
- truth_seeker 6y agoI can't speak for Jespen. But I am using it from last several years and it never ditched me even at the transaction data flow rate of 20K per second. Database alone isn't the deciding factor, how you used it in your application architecture matters the most. No database is perfect but some are more flexible than others.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- pier25 6y agoMy comment was about failed transactions. Are you using ACID transactions?
- truth_seeker 6y agoYep. MongoDB 4.2 In fact we replaced Kafka with Change Streams( little over 7k messages per second) and ES with text search (2K queries per second) in MongoDB on 16 CPU core nodes in our cluster. I don't believe in any benchmark unless it matches the business use case and development practices I use at work. I recommend the same to others.
- ra 6y agowhenever I hear of mongodb - I think of that "but it's web scale" video.
- pier25 6y agoHaha yeah me too :) This is the video if anyone is wondering: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2F-DItXtZs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2F-DItXtZs
- justin66 6y agoHSBC Commerical might have just asked everyone to put their data into a mongodb data store that nobody ever uses, which would make the headline technically true but kind of irrelevant. One thing you can be sure of is that they didn't stop using 65 relational databases.