Here is the case as handed down by the 7th Circuit. http://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/rssExec.pl?Submit=Display&Path=Y2020/D01-24/C:19-1944:J:Kanne:aut:T:fn

Here is the case as handed down by the 7th Circuit. http://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/rssExec.pl?Submit=Display&Path=Y2020/D01-24/C:19-1944:J:Kanne:aut:T:fnOp:N:2464184:S:0 http://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/rssExec.pl?Submit=Disp... I would mostly ignore the Harvard Law Review's recent cases section. It is written by second year law students with barely any supervision. Circuit Court judges write in plainer, better English than law students. Also, I know link rot is a thing, but seriously, all of the opinions are available copyright free and probably as PDFs provided by the courts who issue them. The workers who do have valid arbitration agreements aren't prevented from suing by this case, that was already clearly the law before. That is not in dispute. This case holds that in case some employees are prevented from suing by their arbitration agreements, Facebook can skip giving them notice if it can show the court the actual signed arbitration agreements. That is all.