3 ms·
That transition was greatly assisted by the huge performance difference between Intel and PowerPC especially for the laptop chips that most users were using. I
by majormajor 6y ago
That transition was greatly assisted by the huge performance difference between Intel and PowerPC especially for the laptop chips that most users were using.
It took developers a long time to have stuff fully ported, but it wasn't a huge deal - if you switch to a chip that's twice as fast and take a 50% hit on the emulation layer, you haven't lost much.
I'm very curious to see stuff that isn't first- or second-party already-natively-recompiled stuff works. There's a lot of quality-of-life Mac native apps that I like, that aren't backed by a bunch of dev resources.
- scarface74 6y agoThere is just the opposite precedent for the 68K to PPC transition. My 6100/60 (PPC 601/60) was about the speed of a 68030/25Mhz Mac when running emulated software. It was actually slower than my upgraded 68030/40Mhz Mac when running emulated code. My Mac was less than half the speed of top end 68K Macs. The PPC Macs couldn’t emulate a 68K floating point unit at all.