4 ms·
The original model (lending out one digital copy per physical copy held) has merit [0]. It's called "controlled digital lending." The issue is that the Interne
by kevindong 6y ago
The original model (lending out one digital copy per physical copy held) has merit [0]. It's called "controlled digital lending."
The issue is that the Internet Archive is lending out unlimited digital copies if they hold even one physical copy. At best, that's a legally dubious position. The Internet Archive even admits this practice wouldn't qualify as "controlled digital lending." [1]
[0]: https://help.archive.org/hc/en-us/articles/360042654251-National-Emergency-Library-FAQs#h_11e65d8d-badc-499a-aa93-8242abbab2e3 https://help.archive.org/hc/en-us/articles/360042654251-Nati...
[1]: https://help.archive.org/hc/en-us/articles/360042654251-National-Emergency-Library-FAQs#h_994793fd-f604-4dda-a781-e5571f3ee117 https://help.archive.org/hc/en-us/articles/360042654251-Nati...
- boomboomsubban 6y ago>At best, that's a legally dubious position. Hence the lawsuit. The internet Archive is arguing this as part of the CDL's "fair use" portion. Presumably they view the program as allowing libraries to continue offering their "vital function to society" while being closed. http://blog.archive.org/2020/03/30/internet-archive-responds-why-we-released-the-national-emergency-library/ http://blog.archive.org/2020/03/30/internet-archive-responds...