The call to action, section 5, is exceptional for an academic paper. I'm surprised the first suggestion doesn't already exist on S.O. Honestly this is my bigge

The call to action, section 5, is exceptional for an academic paper. I'm surprised the first suggestion doesn't already exist on S.O. Honestly this is my biggest complaint with the web in general: immortal anti-information. Proposing analysis and strategies for combatting it on curated platforms is a great first step. I think also implicit in this discussion is the role of the readers to vote with their mouses, so to speak. Without feedback from users, the mechanisms can't work effectively. Which is why I try to upvote as much as reasonable on HN and SO.