In addition to the excellent cases linked by the other poster, here are some more: Burwell v. Hobby Lobby (2014) - Companies can refuse to comply with the Affo

In addition to the excellent cases linked by the other poster, here are some more: Burwell v. Hobby Lobby (2014) - Companies can refuse to comply with the Affordable Care Act on providing contraception coverage. National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra (2018) - An example of the first amendment as a deregulation tool. Basically SCOTUS ruled "crisis pregnancy centers" can not be forced to disclose that they're complete nonsense and don't provide real healthcare. In addition, the current SCOTUS has signaled they're open to reexamining the non-delegation doctrine and the unitary executive theory. Basically, if the conservative wing gets their way, two things will happen: Executive agencies will lose their ability to create regulations, and independent agencies will cease to exist. This would be a cataclysmic catastrophe. Every agency listed here would either cease to exist or come under a department directly without a board made up of independent members. This would mean direct political interference at all times: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independent_agencies_of_the_United_States_government#Examples_of_agencies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independent_agencies_of_the_Un... For those who don't want to click, this includes things like the Fed board of Governors, the FCC, the NLRB, and the NTSB. They would become even more irrelevant if they lost their rule making abilities. All rule making would revert to Congress. Let me try to emphasize how much of a shitshow this would be. Federal Regulations are mostly technical, and need deep expertise in order to develop them. This is why there's a lot of back and forth between private industry and the government. It's true this probably leads to corruption, but I'm symathetic to the argument that these are the only people with the expertise to develop the regulations in the first place. For example, here's a paragraph from the FCC regulations around RF exposure and safety: The SAR limits for general population/uncontrolled exposure are 0.08 W/kg, as averaged over the whole body, and a peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over any 1 gram of tissue (defined as a tissue volume in the shape of a cube). Exceptions are the parts of the human body treated as extremities, such as hands, wrists, feet, ankles, and pinnae, where the peak spatial-average SAR limit is 4 W/kg, averaged over any 10 grams of tissue (defined as a tissue volume in the shape of a cube). Exposure may be averaged over a time period not to exceed 30 minutes to determine compliance with general population/uncontrolled SAR limits. Do you seriously expect Congress to A) spend time on this stuff? and B) know WTF they're talking about in the first place? No. Instead, they'll just take already written legislation directly from lobbyists, and it won't be subject to the usual rules around public comment and notice, allowing corporations to pass exactly what they want. This is the entire goal.