> Thanks for your followup thoughts. Pleased the > conversation has evolved to focus on architecture and > performance rather than naming alone. Agreed. Mayb

> Thanks for your followup thoughts. Pleased the > conversation has evolved to focus on architecture and > performance rather than naming alone. Agreed. Maybe it wasn't so clear originally, but part of the naming issue came from the point that a fair comparison hadn't been made with the "previous" model. > re: GitHub comment deletion This was referring to the comments in the GitHub issues of Ultralytics. But in any case, benefit of the doubt is given. Some people doubted their association with the project and the comments are now gone - so let's see.