4 ms·
What you’re arguing is “monopolies are OK because China does it”. If we’re arguing about power grabs then what happens if China gets more powerful because they
by almost_usual 6y ago
What you’re arguing is “monopolies are OK because China does it”.
If we’re arguing about power grabs then what happens if China gets more powerful because they have an authoritarian government?
Does that mean the US needs needs to be authoritarian now too? No thanks.
- logicchains 6y agoIt's not about okay or not okay, it's just pointing out that breaking up Amazon could actually result in worse outcomes for America.
- almost_usual 6y agoWe’ll be deeper into a Cold War at that point where our allies will need to make decisions about who they’re siding with.
- roosterdawn 6y ago> Does that mean the US needs needs to be authoritarian now too? No thanks. I think that the concern you touched upon is essentially the lose-lose quagmire that we as a country arrived at during the onset of the cold war, a war that I believe never truly ended. To answer your question: the problem with mutually assured destruction doctrine is that it necessarily results in an arms race that no superpower can pull out of. Sadly, I question whether a country can be a superpower without also trending more in the authoritarian direction.