> by all means point the errors you find That it's conducted on humans (a.k.a. very small sample, not generalizable, non-objective metrics, hard to remove obs

> by all means point the errors you find That it's conducted on humans (a.k.a. very small sample, not generalizable, non-objective metrics, hard to remove observer bias etc.)? I think regardless of personal opinion, just based on a Bayesian / base rate mental model, you should default to disbelieving any published social studies (I refuse to call it "science") that haven't been rigorously replicated.