Ok, so the name gives the correct implication to pilots and everyone else will be confused, and that's the perfect name for it? I don't have a problem with the

Ok, so the name gives the correct implication to pilots and everyone else will be confused, and that's the perfect name for it? I don't have a problem with the name. If increasing the safety of the system is your priority driver focus detection seems a much better complaint. But if I have to read another comment explaining that it's fine because it fits the technical definition from aviation I'm going to scream. It's such a simplistic summation of a genuinely complicated question. For instance the AP style guide has given guidelines on language to use for partially autonomous vehicles. They're concerned enough to take it seriously. https://www.caranddriver.com/features/columns/a32702153/the-associated-press-wants-everyone-to-stop-calling-cars-autonomous/ https://www.caranddriver.com/features/columns/a32702153/the-...