5 ms·

Ask HN: Alternatives to S3 Buckets?

5 points by _bxg1 6y ago

Especially for smaller/personal projects. I know Google has an equivalent product, but I'm just trying to get the lay of the land. The bucket equivalent of DigitalOcean's hosting would also be interesting to know about (or does DigitalOcean themselves have a bucket product?).

NonEUCitizen 6y ago
https://wasabi.com/s3-compatible-cloud-storage/ https://wasabi.com/s3-compatible-cloud-storage/ BUT their "free egress" is not really free egress, since: https://wasabi.com/cloud-storage-pricing/pricing-faqs/ https://wasabi.com/cloud-storage-pricing/pricing-faqs/ "If your storage use case exceeds the guidelines of our free egress policy on a regular basis, we will contact you to change your pricing plan to one that involves paid egress or we may limit your egress."
totetsu 6y ago
Minio is a self hostable object storage project https://github.com/minio/minio https://github.com/minio/minio
b3u 6y ago
Is there a reason you don't want to use S3? It's hard to recommend a product without understanding your goals here.
- _bxg1 6y ago
  I don't love the idea of giving Amazon money. And while I haven't done much research, I would imagine there might be an offering that does a better job catering to small projects, since S3 is very much built for "full-sized" use cases. Could be wrong about that. But mainly I'm just curious to know what the players are in the space.
  - jordansmith 6y ago
    The cost of S3 for any small to medium sized project is so minuscule you’re not really giving amazon much money. Especially if you compare it to using EC2 or another VPS provider like digital ocean
  - tcbasche 6y ago
    > I don't love the idea of giving Amazon money. Does anyone?
sergiotapia 6y ago
There's backblaze's B2 offering. cheap af, and s3 compatible.
oneearedrabbit 6y ago
Yes, DigitalOcean offers S3-compatible storage: https://www.digitalocean.com/products/spaces/ https://www.digitalocean.com/products/spaces/. However, they use a different pricing model than Amazon S3: they charge $5/month for 250GiB (additional storage is $0.02/GiB) + outbound data transfer for the first 1024GiB is free, then $0.01/GiB.
borplk 6y ago
Not sure about your use case but if it's simple enough consider not using an object storage service and just serve the files from the filesystem.
nreece 6y ago
Vultr Object Storage (S3 compatible): https://www.vultr.com/products/object-storage/ https://www.vultr.com/products/object-storage/ Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage (S3 compatible): https://www.backblaze.com/b2/cloud-storage.html https://www.backblaze.com/b2/cloud-storage.html
imagetic 6y ago
+1 for backblaze B2.