3 ms·
I love the cover art on the paper. Sums up the issue perfectly. For those who will not read the PDF: Google completed a series of transactions that allowed i
by pwdisswordfish2 6y ago
I love the cover art on the paper. Sums up the issue perfectly. For those who will not read the PDF:
Google completed a series of transactions that allowed it to participate in every level of the ad stack. (#1)
Google leveraged its power in search advertising, in which it holds monopoly power to coerce advertisers to
use Google products to access the display market as well. (#2)
Google advantaged itself through arbitrage and cross-subsidization opportunities made possible by the fact
that it, and it alone, operates at all levels of the value chain. (#3)
Google withheld interoperability in order to disadvantage, foreclose, and punish its ad stack rivals. (#6)
Google designed auction processes that cement its own market power and raise rivals
costs. (#10)
Google kept key market information hidden to shield itself from scrutiny from publishers, advertisers, and
potential new entrants, suppressing otherwise natural competitive forces. (#14)
Google leveraged its control over the ad tech stack and Google Analytics to weaken rival sources of display
supply. (#18)
1. Acquiring Independent Companies To Cement Its Role Across the Ad Stack
2. Leveraging Market Power in General Search into Display
3. Designing Auctions That Facilitate Arbitrage and Rent Seeking
4. Cross-Subsidizing Competitive Functions of the Ad Tech Stack with Monopolized Functions In Order to Rise Rivals' Costs and Foreclose
5. Deceptive Gathering and Integration of Data
6. Strategic Disabling of Interoperability To Disadvantage Rivals
7. Withholding Interoperability to Steer Demand and Supply Through Its Own Exchange
8. Providing Exclusive Programmatic Access to YouTube Though Google's DSP
9. Retiring the Third-Party Cookie
10. Disadvantaging Rival Exchanges by Google s Publisher Ad Server
11. Undermining Header Bidding Through the Development of So-Called Open Bidding
12. Undermining Header Bidding Through Exclusionary Features of AMP
13. Designing Analytics to Steer Market Participants to Google Products and Prevent Entry
14. Resisting Transparency at All Levels of Ad Tech Stack
15. Obscuring Fees So That Competitors Cannot Enter and Compete Effectively
16. Using Privacy Laws as an Excuse to Hide Performance Data
17. Thwarting Publisher Efforts to Understand Source of Payments
18. Designing Attribution to Favor Search and Disadvantage Publishers
19. Raising Rivals Costs and Foreclosure of Existing and Potential Horizontal Competitors
20. Capturing Publisher Data in Order to Monetize Their Audiences
They are not looking at Facebook, Amazon, or other walled gardens as viable alternatives for those who want to place ads on the open web. There is only one "choice". "All roads lead through Google".