3 ms·
Hm, perhaps the HN should be closed as well and everyone should have their own blog instead?... or ask the peer reviewers to discuss and judge papers on their b
by mihaaly 6y ago
Hm, perhaps the HN should be closed as well and everyone should have their own blog instead?... or ask the peer reviewers to discuss and judge papers on their blogs instead?
- chrisseaton 6y agoNot sure what you mean, sorry? When a conference chooses which papers to accept, that's them accepting the paper. If you don't want to accept the paper then you don't have to, but yes you don't get a right to veto some other conference doing it.
- mihaaly 6y agoBut you are aware of journal articles as well, dont't you? And how standardized and comprehensive the peer selection is? (it is not, in general, with huge variations)
- chrisseaton 6y ago> But you are aware of journal articles as well, dont't you? Yes. > And how standardized and comprehensive the peer selection is? (it is not, in general, with huge variations) Yes. So what? My point was you can accept whatever papers you want. You can't make or stop someone else accepting. Seems like a fine situation to me? Anyone can recognise the papers they want to.