4 ms·
I don't think the genealogy is that convenient - the Eastern Roman Empire arguably has a stronger claim to being the successors of "The Greeks" that are often c
by joycian 6y ago
I don't think the genealogy is that convenient - the Eastern Roman Empire arguably has a stronger claim to being the successors of "The Greeks" that are often claimed to be the root of "Western" civilization than any place in Western Europe. Constantinople became the capital of the entire Roman Empire by 324 and the importance of the West (and Rome itself) for the empire dwindled already hundreds of years before the official "fall" of the Western Empire (which is arguable, among other things, because the "Gothic" king Theodoric received the official Western imperial regalia from the Eastern Emperor, after Odoaker had sent them to Constaninople when he deposed Romulus Augustulus). The Gallic provinces even spent some time as an independent Empire during the Crisis of the Third Century.
In the end, the modern name of "Byzantine" seems to be misplaced - these people were the Romans.
- kgwgk 6y agoThey were Romans... but that doesn’t make them Westerners. It’s true that the notion of Occidental culture is not purely geographical (see Al-Andalus, which had nevertheless some influence in Spanish culture). Should we consider “occidental” the Bulgarian or Roman Empires from one thousand years ago? You may want to do so, but then you may be surprised that they are “somehow” not usually considered as such.