3 ms·
Looks really interesting. I‘ve always admired the erlang community but writing slang always felt like something was missing and having recently dove into Haskel
by rudolph9 6y ago
Looks really interesting. I‘ve always admired the erlang community but writing slang always felt like something was missing and having recently dove into Haskell this looks like it has a lot of potential.
Few questions:
1) how stable is hamler? I’m eager to dive in but know I don’t have time to work through frequent language bugs if I’m going to do anything real with it.
2) A good reference, which I didn’t see in the doc and having a hard time articulating my self would be a comparison of Hamler vs Haskell erlang FFI support? https://hackage.haskell.org/package/erlang https://hackage.haskell.org/package/erlang
3) What are the key differences between Hamler And Haskell (sort of a continuation of the last question)?
- vmchale 6y ago> What are the key differences between Hamler And Haskell Targeting BEAM is pretty huge!
- rudolph9 6y agoHa yes! That sounds great but theoretically the version of Haskell currently intercepted by ghc could be compiled to beam similar to how there is a compiler for the javaVM. What is fundamentally different about Hamler and Haskell?
- regularfry 6y agoPurescript is strict, so I'd imagine Hamler is too.
- Vosporos 6y ago>1) how stable is hamler? I’m eager to dive in but know I don’t have time to work through frequent language bugs if I’m going to do anything real with it. Still a work in progress >3) What are the key differences between Hamler And Haskell (sort of a continuation of the last question)? Think of the differences between Haskell and Purescript, because while the syntax is Haskell-like, most of the infrastructure is based on PureScript
- carterklein13 6y agoThis definitely seems like a best of both worlds type situation.