3 ms·
Well there's not one single "the goal" that everyone follows. Some people are genuinely happy to be working for a company they really believe in, some people ar
by cactus2093 6y ago
Well there's not one single "the goal" that everyone follows. Some people are genuinely happy to be working for a company they really believe in, some people are looking for experience to level up their career/rise up the corporate ladder/start their own company in the future.
If you're just looking for a payout, going to a bunch of startups for 1 year and then moving on and collecting equity from all of them is an interesting approach. It potentially improves your odds of a > 0 payout compared to going all in on one startup and staying in one place for many years. But I suspect if you're optimizing for a combination of expected value + downside risk, you really can't do better than FAANG or a large unicorn. I suspect a very, very small number of people who have worked at any combination of various startups for the past 5 years will have outperformed someone who worked at Google that whole time. And that's before even taking into account the time value/liquidity of the public stock - even if some of the startups over that time period do go on to be successful, you might have to wait 5+ years after you leave to cash it out.
- NotSammyHagar 6y agoI think you are right that fang companies are the place to make money, better than startups. I've spent 2/3 of my career at fang and 1/3 in startups. Startups are fun but I really benefitted by a solid engineering start.