4 ms·
Achieving a new breakthrough in computing is often very expensive. Deep Blue is estimated to cost IBM over $100 million over a decade [1]. And in comparison to
by tech-historian 6y ago
Achieving a new breakthrough in computing is often very expensive. Deep Blue is estimated to cost IBM over $100 million over a decade [1].
And in comparison to large tech company R&D budgets, the amount cited in the article is a drop in the bucket. Consider the fact that Google spent $26 billion in R&D budget in 2019 alone [2]. Microsoft spent almost $17 billion [3].
[1] https://www.extremetech.com/computing/76552-project-deep-blitz-chess-pc-takes-on-deep-blue/2 https://www.extremetech.com/computing/76552-project-deep-bli...
[2] https://www.statista.com/statistics/507858/alphabet-google-rd-costs/ https://www.statista.com/statistics/507858/alphabet-google-r...
[3] https://www.statista.com/statistics/267806/expenditure-on-research-and-development-by-the-microsoft-corporation/ https://www.statista.com/statistics/267806/expenditure-on-re...
- sukilot 6y agoNote that everything in software development is R&D. Building (not operating) Gmail and Android and Office and Azure are R&D.
- geodel 6y agoRight. That's the Development part of Research and Development.
- ViViDboarder 6y agoDid you mean to say “not everything”? Much may be, but certainly not everything. As you said, operating or maintaining software is not generally considered R&D. Development without the Research component is just Development, not Research and Development.