On the whole I agree about darknet being readable, it seemed well written and I've found it useful to grok how training libraries are written. I think they've m

On the whole I agree about darknet being readable, it seemed well written and I've found it useful to grok how training libraries are written. I think they've moved to other backends now for the main computation though. But.. it was still very much undocumented (and there were details missing from the paper). I think this almost certainly led to some slowdown in porting to other frameworks. And the fact its written in C has probably limited how much people are willing to contribute to the project. > Checkout the translation of "you can you up,no can no bb" (see other comments). That's from an 11 day old github account with no history, not Ultralytics as far as I know. > Kind of, I am personally still evaluating this network fully. Contention referring to the community response rather than the performance of the model itself.