If they had increased their lending by a finite amount, matching the number of copies in closed libraries they'd been in touch with, then I could sort of unders

If they had increased their lending by a finite amount, matching the number of copies in closed libraries they'd been in touch with, then I could sort of understand an increase in keen lending over their normal levels, as it would not be putting the publishers in a worse overall position. However, as it stands the unlimited lending seems naïve and ill thought through.