3 ms·
The (synchronous) 0.4s per move number is misleading (and wrong), that's not what the paper is saying. The "footnote 1" of the article is wrong.
by NVHacker 6y ago
The (synchronous) 0.4s per move number is misleading (and wrong), that's not what the paper is saying.
The "footnote 1" of the article is wrong.