3 ms·
I commented elsewhere but I find this a terrific example of a bold prospective move in this space. They took a risk for which the patron reward ratio was potent
by themodelplumber 6y ago
I commented elsewhere but I find this a terrific example of a bold prospective move in this space. They took a risk for which the patron reward ratio was potentially huge. Also, publishers should have anticipated this sort of thing and prepared bridges so they didn't have to go on the attack and waste 10 different types of capital. That they are shutting down a public benefit with relevant impact (IA release gives an example) during a pandemic is a dick move in more than one way. This part among others will come back to bite them.
IA didn't release copyrighted books for free; at the very least this depends on your definition of "release" and personally after checking out a book I find that I no longer have access after ~2 weeks. This kind of timeline is much more like a library than a bookstore.
I think any smart author who cares about their craft, and knowledge in general, would much rather their publishing representative find a way to moderate and proactively track this new approach than turn the whole thing into a war, making a library--of all things--into the enemy.
- Mindwipe 6y ago> Also, publishers should have anticipated this sort of thing and prepared bridges so they didn't have to go on the attack and waste 10 different types of capital. Publishers repeatedly asked the IA to stop obviously breaking the law before filing the lawsuit, and were ignored.
- themodelplumber 6y agoIf that's all they did, it makes one wonder if the publishing corporate leadership teams understand how laws are made, or rewritten? They completely missed their interface with IA. IA now has a lot of social leverage thanks to these publishers being about as creative and flexible as a concrete patio.
- drawfloat 6y agoWhereas the publishers now have legal leverage. And guess which one actually counts when it comes to getting sued.