> I think that given the well-known bias of NYT People saying it doesn't make it true. The only argument you've made is quibbling about the order in which the

> I think that given the well-known bias of NYT People saying it doesn't make it true. The only argument you've made is quibbling about the order in which the facts are introduced. I see 7 subheadings in the story. The details of who shot when follows the second one. But not putting it first is evidence of an agenda? Come on.