> how can recording something be considered speech You have to go back and understand the jurisprudence of US courts a long time to understand it. Basically yo

> how can recording something be considered speech You have to go back and understand the jurisprudence of US courts a long time to understand it. Basically you can't take the word "speech" too literally; it could be literal speech or the ability to assemble/protest, or the ability write a book, or the ability to spend money on a political election (what the sane world calls bribery far more than the USA does).