3 ms·
> Then simply do not add a CA or self-signed cert to your cert store. IOW: the default is secure against SSL MITM. Nothing to "get used to" or "abused". Once u
by JoshTriplett 6y ago
> Then simply do not add a CA or self-signed cert to your cert store. IOW: the default is secure against SSL MITM. Nothing to "get used to" or "abused".
Once upon a time, there were public CAs who would sell you a sub-CA certificate for use on a hardware MITM box, so that you could "transparently" MITM systems on a network without adding a CA. That is now considered unacceptable, and grounds for terminating a CA. What "security" practices in use today will we be saying "once upon a time" about years from now?
- droitbutch 6y ago> What "security" practices in use today will we be saying "once upon a time" about years from now? Can an industry not mature? Previous behavior is not an indicator of the future - and anyone worried about it can contribute to scrutinizing CA's and their guidelines today. Not sure pre-judging current actors based on past actions during a relative nascent industry gets us anywhere - especially since you still haven't provided an alternative solution for enterprises to prevent data breaches or data exfiltration WITHOUT inspection happening somewhere else other than the egress chokepoint.