In the case of Wikipedia: If a single search result answers someone's question, it probably wasn't all that profound. 30-volume encyclopedias are great for lea

In the case of Wikipedia: If a single search result answers someone's question, it probably wasn't all that profound. 30-volume encyclopedias are great for learning in depth, but sometimes you just need to know something fairly trivial... more digits in pi, say. "71% of [Freddy Mercury] searches end there, without a click to a specific site." I'd like to know about a lot of things in more depth, but there's only so much time. If I'm focused on reading something that just mentions a name (it assumes I know) I might just search it to complete that omission. The article fails to differentiate the two search-types, and so leaves that important question hanging.