3 ms·
Not to be too pedantic, but little omega is not the first uncountable ordinal (it is countable by definition), it is the first infinite one.
by cosbynator 16y ago
Not to be too pedantic, but little omega is not the first uncountable ordinal (it is countable by definition), it is the first infinite one.
- mturmon 16y agoYou know what, you're right (and if I may add, on both counts ;-). The wikipedia page I referenced, loosely summarized, is referring to an ordinal number with the cardinality aleph-1. The plain omega that I should have referenced has cardinality aleph-0. Unfortunately, the ordinal I wanted does not have its own wikipedia page. WTF? Merely countable is not notable enough?
- barista 16y agoSome research project about a new language and the top comments are about how weird its name is and how the character looks like a butt? I'm speechless.