4 ms·
Jitsi is great! If they can figure out a good webinar solution it could be an absolute killer. As it stands, it's (in my opinion) really just useful for small s
by mstade 6y ago
Jitsi is great! If they can figure out a good webinar solution it could be an absolute killer. As it stands, it's (in my opinion) really just useful for small scale interactive meetings at this point, not 100+ participant events.
It's really great as a face-to-face solution though, where Zoom and many others are actually kind of overkill.
- paulryanrogers 6y agoBigBlueButton may be better for that scale. It's interesting this desire for a one size fits all video conference.
- nix23 6y agoI cant imagine being productive with 100+ peoples in a video-conference (not even real ones), are you making raves/partys over Jitsy?
- mstade 6y agoI should've made it clear when I say "events" I mean more webinar style events. 100+ participant meetings where everyone is an equal participant isn't useful, but that sort of thing isn't uncommon if you're holding all hands calls or annual shareholder meetings etc.
- nix23 6y agoYeah but then a streaming solution with a separate voting/chat/messaging solution is the way to go.
- mstade 6y agoWell, no – not if you still need audience participation with video and/or audio. Things like annual/quarterly meetings and such where people have a right to speak etc. It's really not that different from a typical video conference, just that the moderator has controls to mute/unmute people and participants can't unmute themselves. Polling/voting/chat features I reckon are secondary I reckon.