3 ms·
Eiffel uses 'ensure' and 'require' for these meanings. .NET Code Contracts (may it rest in peace) uses 'Ensures' and 'Requires' for these meanings as well.
by rhencke 6y ago
Eiffel uses 'ensure' and 'require' for these meanings.
.NET Code Contracts (may it rest in peace) uses 'Ensures' and 'Requires' for these meanings as well.
- whitten 6y agowhat about for invariants ?
- rhencke 6y agoEiffel uses 'invariant', and .NET Code Contracts uses 'Invariant'.
- skrebbel 6y agoassert() is pretty much the industry standard for invariants, right? they're usually evaluated at runtime but it should be perfectly possible for a static analysis tool to "evaluate" them statically.
- judofyr 6y agoassert() by itself is typically not the same as "defining an invariant". An invariant is an expression which should be true for the whole life-time of the block/function/program/anything, but assert() only defines an assertion at a specific point.
- nimmer 6y agoPlus, assert() is commonly used for runtime checks, not static analysis.
- rurban 6y agoYou can use static_assert but compilers observe assert already. assume is another commonly used invariant.
- Someone 6y ago“An invariant is an expression which should be true for the whole life-time of the block/function/program/anything” It should hold at both entry and exit of a block, but practically always doesn’t for the entire block.