4 ms·
I'd seriously doubt any court will consider a defensive move like deflecting sound waves while under duress as an assault. On top of that,the effectiveness of
by jascii 6y ago
I'd seriously doubt any court will consider a defensive move like deflecting sound waves while under duress as an assault.
On top of that,the effectiveness of a single point-source falls with the inverse square of the distance so the effectiveness of this "assault" would likely be minimal.
- sp332 6y agoA federal district court agreed that bleeding on an officer's uniform constitutes the crime of property damage. https://newsone.com/3159860/ferguson-man-charged-with-bleeding-on-cops-wins-appeal/ https://newsone.com/3159860/ferguson-man-charged-with-bleedi...
- jascii 6y agoThat's pretty absurd! And did get reversed in appeal.
- trhway 6y agomoney quote: " a reasonable officer could have believed that beating a subdued and compliant Mr. Davis while causing only a concussion, scalp lacerations and bruising with almost no permanent damage did not violate the Constitution,” the district court ruled in tossing out the case." With even federal judges like that i wonder what hope can be there at all.
- ashtonkem 6y agoNew York courts have suspended Habeas Corpus, despite indication from the DA office that they had no intention to charge the vast majority of those arrested for breaking the curfew. Another judge rubber stamped an subpoena against reason for mean but non-threatening comments against the FBI (“go to hell” I believe was the phrase), and a gag order preventing reason from talking about it. Do not underestimate the willingness of the courts to rubber stamp shocking abuses by the police. They are, after all, the ones that made up QI.