3 ms·
I grew up believing having thick skin was really important. I took this to heart, and now nothing phases me (and I’ve been in a variety of nasty situations that
by DecoPerson 6y ago
I grew up believing having thick skin was really important. I took this to heart, and now nothing phases me (and I’ve been in a variety of nasty situations that confirmed this).
I realize this is not the norm, but I wish it was. Avoiding trigger words and peoples’ sensitivities is frustrating and further complicates complex discussions. I’m not saying we should be robots. I still have feelings. If someone I love shows me that I’ve let them down, I feel absolutely terrible.
Thick skin + freedom of speech (but not freedom of information or freedom to shout) + people being generally genuinely respectful (as in tough-love) = a pretty good civilization in my eyes
Buuut I accept we live in a world with sensitive people and as such must continue to be considerate of their feelings. At least it’s not illegal to trigger people!
- gowld 6y agoThick skin is a fantastic skill to develop in yourself and others. Amusing yourself by testing how thick other people's skin is not. Legal doesn't equal good.
- wobbly_bush 6y ago> Avoiding trigger words and peoples’ sensitivities is frustrating and further complicates complex discussions I wonder if that is a result of believing having a thick skin is important and anything otherwise is now found frustrating.
- salehenrahman 6y agoI'm not sure if you are generally lamenting about people's sensitivities, or you are just dismissing jokes about firing as "not a big deal", and that "people should get over it". Let me repeat what the author of the article posted: DO NOT joke about firing people. You don't need to have a thin skin to take comments about firing seriously. When a manager said that they'd fire you, it's only smart to begin looking for work elsewhere. The moment they said that, it's the moment that they have demonstrated the following: - your employment status is precarious, under that manager (yes, employment is generally precarious, but at a company with a good culture, it's the company's financials that predicates your employment status, not financials plus your manager) - your manager has demonstrated that their power has gone to their head, potentially leading to bad decisions under their management - assuming they were joking about firing you in the first place, your manager's words regarding anything related to your job function cannot be generally taken seriously This is not a thin skin issue. This is a bad manager issue. Start looking for work elsewhere.
- im3w1l 6y agoI don't think this is about being offensive or sensitivity. From the subordinates perspective, a joke about being fired could be a way of telling them that they are underperforming. Or it could be a false alarm. It is perfectly rational for them to spend a huge amount of effort thinking and worrying about where they stand. If you say you wouldn't, then you are the one making a mistake. So in conclusion, making the joke imposes a big effort and burden on the target.
- vorpalhex 6y agoThere's shades of gray here. One of the issues of threatening to fire a subordinate is that you very much can, that being fired is a high anxiety issue for most people, and even if they have thick skin you're still moving towards a more hostile environment. I have thick skin, but I'm still going to treat someone who is joking about my livelihood negatively. That's a separate issue from someone being triggered or emotionally hurt because they read a book or a professor talked accurately about a historical event. That's a case of not being thick skinned enough for reality.
- jabroni_salad 6y agoIt's great for peers, dealing with opposing viewpoints, and controlling your response vs having a reaction. But when it comes to the person who controls whether I work here or not, how my performance reviews look, what my bonus is, etc I just don't feel like I can brush off their politicking and weird mind games. I need to keep that person happy whether they want it or not to ensure my continued survival. Maybe they mean nothing by it, but what if there is a chance that they do? People have gotten termed for much less.
- standardUser 6y agoNot wanting your entire livelihood casually threatened is not sensitivity. If you have twenty nuts to last you the winter, and a bugger squirrel comes by and casually says he might take your nuts away from you, you are not being sensitive if you are upset or worried. You are facing a direct threat to your survival and well being, and that of your family. This isn't a dirty joke, it's abuse of a hierarchical relationship.
- monktastic1 6y ago(FYI, the word you're looking for is "fazes.")