3 ms·
It does not seem morally right to "convict" (in the media) this man posthumously, based on no technical evidence. They are trying to put forward a story as cano
by kzrdude 6y ago
It does not seem morally right to "convict" (in the media) this man posthumously, based on no technical evidence. They are trying to put forward a story as canon, and while that is good for the many (the police, and for Sweden in general), the integrity of the judicial process and this man's right to due process is sacrificed.
- renewiltord 6y agoHe's dead. Might as well throw a stick over the walls with Diogenes' corpse.
- kzrdude 6y agoDefamation of passed person is a law in Sweden, even if it weighs heavily on the impact of living family, it is still a crime in itself.
- progre 6y agoHis wife is still alive though
- patrik1900 6y agoHe has relatives. And smearing a dead man is never right. The useless police should just smear themselves instead. absolutely useless. And to think the the last investigators had the audacity to smear the predecessors when they are just as useless themselves...